Personally, I think opposition to any kind of intervention that defaced, damaged or substantially modify our magnificent area , legacy of our ancestors for decades prey to radical and irreversible changes in human, for the most part consist of the construction of roads and residential-commercial. The expressway Fenadora-Anzu-Busch (incomplete on this last leg), major subdivisions to Pasquero to Boscariz and Farra, large groups of buildings dell'Altanon, the Towers area and D'Amico are just some examples of how the territory has been the subject of radical Feltre changed by human actions and activities. Works "Pharaoh" who often have not taken no account of reality in which they were going to leap and for which - beyond the very important aspect of primary environmental and landscape - it is important to assess the actual utility.
stuferò I never claim that our region does not need new roads. Because this is a model that does not lead anywhere and that no country seriously in Europe is doing, especially now that the Dolomites are Unesco World Heritage (One thinks of the controversy over the extension of the A27, another big monstrosity). Gli amministratori e i cittadini devono capire che la costruzione di nuove strade non allenta i problemi legali al traffico in una città, bensì serve solo a spostare parte del carico veicolare urbano in altre zone del territorio, distruggendole con asfalto e cemento.
A mio avviso, il vero futuro del trasporto urbano consiste nell’agire sui piani di mobilità, nel creare delle vere alternative di trasporto, incentivando e potenziando quello pubblico, sviluppando reti di piste ciclabili, al fine di disincentivare l’uso dei mezzi privati motorizzati nelle aree urbane che comporta solamente traffico e inquinamento.
Nella fattispecie della Gronda Nord , ho visto che contro This new road has been backed by many citizens spontaneously, which are now also ready to take action (and here I want to emphasize that the only way to ask our administrators a "change course" on important decisions is the use of local signal, perhaps a policy of territorial little appreciated by the citizens).
The grounds for challenging the new road, even in this case, can be said to be well founded and valid: latest version of this century-old project, indeed, the new road will cross portions of land and Tanger already heavily built up, and subtracting once again consuming large portions of our wonderful land. Above born "incomplete" without a piece. Failure to link the work with the Pasquero (which, they say, would have eased off and away Rizzarda Bagnols sur Ceze, capturing traffic Pedavena avenue to direct it towards Belluno), will make it completely in vain because the proposed measure - also the second point view in favor of the project - because the traffic will simply be moved a few kilometers and, therefore, will go to congestion at the new outlet. So why spend public money to destroy the land and create a work incomplete, problematic, and especially upon by most parties, are not necessary?
is why I hope that concerned citizens can take action on several fronts to oppose the proposal , as was the case for the plan Altanon. Also invite all interested parties, primarily administrators, a new, careful and precise evaluation of the consequences of this work which, in my view, nowadays no real reason to be realized.
Richard Sartor
0 comments:
Post a Comment